内容介绍
【Midnight Grand Orchestra】ー「Starpeggio」
星街すいせい ／ 井上拓 ー Suisei Hoshimachi / Taku Inoue
[FLAC 96kHz／24bit]
简介:
| Midnight Grand Orchestra - Starpeggio | [2023-12-13] | 96000/24 stereo | WEB/OTOTOY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01_01_Light The Light.flac | 3408 | 85382421 | E04527AB4189566BB3F93DC975037342 |
| 01_02_Moonlightspeed.flac | 3250 | 79247965 | D487FF0AF35DD27FBBA09CBD4C2B690D |
| 01_03_Midnight Mission.flac | 3420 | 95881113 | 31CF365EE077FAE2FA3F543A470A14A1 |
| 01_04_Igniter.flac | 3444 | 83467990 | A726A67B85477D6EAC1AAEA8CD13B3A0 |
| 01_05_Blackhole Dancehall.flac | 3512 | 85087182 | D570DEE82226758B5F08EE43A026438C |
| 01_06_Starpeggio.flac | 2185 | 20867517 | 43F7F724F128B58CED90591431690086 |
| 01_07_ソリロキー.flac | 3111 | 80423473 | 6B3E7B9BD5E1813A7A8C009AF8FC3B39 |
| 01_08_夜を待つよ.flac | 3145 | 98274316 | 8832F44D40AB3EE50C914E17D2DFE6DA |
%filename_ext% |
%bitrate% |
%filesize% |
$info(MD5) |
If you're as autistic as I am curious about any difference between this and the Amazon rip that's on all the direct DL sites:
TL;DR Amazon had mixed sample rates & an extra 0.0065s of silence at the beginning of every track.
That's it. If you already had it, there's really no reason to get this again...unless you want your dog, dolphin, or pet bat to listen to tracks 2, 3, and 8.
- Track 2 Moonlightspeed is only 44/16 on Amazon. The single was 96/24 elsewhere
- That single and this album version don't match at all with a bit-compare but they sound the same...
- Tracks 1, 4, 5, 6, 7 are identical*
- there are extra null samples on Amazon, a full comparison log for Track 1 is below as an example
- all 5 have the same
624 leading null samplesoffset
- Track 3 Midnight Mission and Track 8 Yoru Wo Matsu Yo are both 48/24 on Amazon, and on their singles but 96/24 here
- Amazon album and previously released singles match
312 leading null sampleson Amazon for both
It's always exactly 6.5ms of extra silence at the beginning on Amazon. 312/48000 == 624/96000 == 0.0065s.
Not sure if there's a technical reason for that or not, maybe whatever ripper "they" use it's such an arbitrary number though...don't care, already bored.
fb2k bit-compare: > Differences found in compared tracks; the tracks became identical after applying offset and truncating first/last samples. > Extra leading/trailing sections contained only null samples.
```Comparing: "...\Starpeggio\01_01_Light The Light.flac" "...\Midnight Grand Orchestra - Starpeggio (Amazon)\01. Light The Light.flac" Differences found: length mismatch - 3:19.094458 vs 3:19.100958, 19113068 vs 19113692 samples. Compared 19113068 samples. Discarded last 624 samples containing non-null values from the longer file. Differences found within the compared range: 38085012 values, 0:00.170667 - 3:19.094448, peak: 1.884946 (+5.51 dBTP) at 2:21.071667, 2ch Channel difference peaks: 1.883662 (+5.50 dBTP) 1.884946 (+5.51 dBTP) File #1 peaks: 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) File #2 peaks: 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) Detected offset as 624 samples.
Comparing again with corrected offset... Compared 19113068 samples, with offset of 624. Discarded 624 leading null samples from file #2. No differences in decoded data found within the compared range. Channel peaks: 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP) 0.942967 (-0.51 dBTP)
Total duration processed: 3:19.094 Time elapsed: 0:05.994 33.21x realtime
---
## *Enjoy*
#### - βøøδ